American Radio Association v. Mobile Steamship Association Inc’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
52 federal appellate · 9 district · 20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 114 later decisions (8 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2020 · most notably Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn (1975), International Longshoremen's Association v. Allied International, Inc. (1982)
52 federal appellate · 9 district · 20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1257 · 29 U.S.C. § 152 (§ 2 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 157 (§ 7 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 160 (§ 10 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 164 (§ 14 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 187 (§ 303 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act))
Relies on Vaca v. Sipes · San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon · Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776 · Linkletter v. Walker · Amalgamated Food Employees Union Local 590 v. Logan Valley Plaza, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 114 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“basis for Board jurisdiction where the primary dispute is beyond its statutory authority . . .”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Louis v. Baldovin, Jr., Regional Director of Region 23 of the National Labor Relations Board, Etc. v. International Longshoremen's Association, Afl-Cio, Defendants- Curtis L. MacK Regional Director of Region 10 of the National Labor Relations Board, Etc. v. International Longshoremen's Association, Afl-Cio, Defendants · Baldovin v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n“within the meaning of the LMRA. The union activity in Windward was directed toward requiring foreign-flag vessels to raise substandard wages being paid to crews throughout the vessels' worldwide maritime operations. The union activity in Ariadne was directed toward requiring a foreign-flag vessel to hire unionized American workers, rather than nonunionized American workers, to service vessels berthed in American ports.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Louis v. Baldovin, Jr., Regional Director of Region 23 of the National Labor Relations Board, Etc. v. International Longshoremen's Association, Afl-Cio, Defendants- Curtis L. MacK Regional Director of Region 10 of the National Labor Relations Board, Etc. v. International Longshoremen's Association, Afl-Cio, Defendants · Baldovin v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n“That the latter effect does not surpass 'the threshold of interference with the maritime operations of foreign vessels which makes the LMRA inapplicable', (Windward, 415 U.S. at 114, 94 S.Ct. at 965, 39 L.Ed.2d at 202) certainly provides no support for the proposition that the former effect also does not surpass that threshold.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Louis v. Baldovin, Jr., Regional Director of Region 23 of the National Labor Relations Board, Etc. v. International Longshoremen's Association, Afl-Cio, Defendants- Curtis L. MacK Regional Director of Region 10 of the National Labor Relations Board, Etc. v. International Longshoremen's Association, Afl-Cio, Defendants · Baldovin v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.