International Telephone & Telegraph Corp., Communications Equipment & Systems Division v. Local 134, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

109 federal appellate · 33 district · 20 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 246 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “of That proceeding, but we think that when Congress defined”

   4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Central Scott Telephone Co. v. Teleconnect Long Distance Services & Systems Co. · Georator Corp. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

2. “[W]hen Congress defined `order' in terms of a `final disposition,' it required that `final disposition' to have some determinate consequences for the party to the [agency] proceeding.”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Georator Corp. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission · Gibson v. National Transportation Safety Board

3. “(b) Unfair labor practices by labor organization It shall be an unfair labor practice for a labor organization or its agents— (4) (i) to engage in, or to induce or encourage any individual employed by any person engaged in commerce or in an industry affecting commerce to engage in, a strike or a refusal in the course of his employment to use, manufacture, process, transport, or otherwise handle or work on any goods, articles, materials, or commodities or to perform any services; or (ii) to threaten, coerce, or restrain any person engaged in commerce or in an industry affecting commerce, where in either case an object thereof is— (B) forcing or requiring any person to cease using, selling, handling, transporting, or otherwise dealing in the products of any other producer, processor, or manufacturer, or to cease doing business with any other person, or forcing or requiring any other employer to recognize or bargain with a labor organization as the representative of his employees unless such labor organization has been certified as the representative of such employees under the provisions of section 159 of this title: Provided, That nothing contained in this clause (B) shall be construed to make unlawful, where not otherwise unlawful, any primary strike or primary picketing; (D) forcing or requiring any employer to assign particular work to employees in a particular labor organization or in a particular trade, craft, or class rather than to employees in another labor organizatio”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 405 F. Supp. 370 - Bechtel Corp. v. Local 215, Laborers' International Union · 162 F. Supp. 2d 246 - Betal Environmental Corp. v. Local Union Number 78