¶1Motion for enlargement of time denied, and the appeal dismissed, sua sponte, on the ground that the appeal was improper and that the proper procedure is review under CPLR article 78 (Judiciary Law, § 755). Order filed. Concur — Stevens, P. J., Markewich, Kupferman, Murphy and Tilzer, JJ:
42 A.D.2d 841
In re Bloom
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 2, 1973
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1973-08-02
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently February 1982
1 federal appellate ·
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1973-08-02
View the full empirical analysis of this case →