42 Ala. 297
Decided January 15, 1868
Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1868-01-15
Heard before Hon. Jno. Q. Loomis. This was a bill filed by Henry H. Bender and Nathaniel Waller, against Sarah Taylor and her husband, J. C. Taylor, as administrators of Walter E. Eand, deceased, Noah H. Gewin and Mary Ann Gewin, his wife, Joseph J. Young, Ann.K. Eand, Greene B. H. Eand, Eliza W. Eand, Sarah W. Eand, and N. G. Eand.
Relies on Bean v. Bean's Adm'r
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1868-01-15
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently May 1924
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The opinion of the chancellor shows conclusively that the bill in this case is multifarious ; and for this reason it was rightfully dismissed. — Tasker v. Small, 3 Mylne & Craig, 63 ; Mole v. Smith, Jac. 490 ; Robertown v. G. W. Railway Co., 10 Simons, 314; Wood v. White, 4 Mylne & Craig, 460 ; Bean v. Bean's Adm'r, 37 Ala. 17 ; Story’s Eq. Pl., Sec. 272.
¶2Decree affirmed, and appellant must pay the costs of this court.