¶1-The first section of the act to regulate judicial proceedings, approved 20 th February, 1866, (Pamphlet Acts, p. 83,) provided for a return, .appearance, and pleading term of the court, in which an action might be brought, thus postponing the judgment to the third term. By the act of 7th December, 1866, (Pamphlet Acts, p. 110,) it is enacted that the provisions of the statute above noticed shall not apply to actions upon contracts made after 25th July, 1865, “ except upon renewals of contracts existing prior to said 25th day of July, 1865.” This latter act repeals the act of 20 th February, 1866, in so far as it affected actions on contracts made after the 25th July, 1865, unless they were renewals of pre-existing contracts. As to contracts of the specified class, the previous law was revived, and judgments under the law thus revived could be taken at the return term. The contract upon which this action was predicated, is a note dated 22d January, 1867, and we can not presume, in the absence of any evidence, that the note was given in renewal of a contract, which existed before the 25th July, 1865. There is, therefore, no disclosure by the record of error in rendering judgment by default at the return term of the summons and complaint.
¶2The return of service is sufficient to sustain the judgment.
¶3Affirmed.