Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

42 Ark. 183

Love v. McAlister

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 15, 1883

Supreme Court of Arkansas · decided 1883-11-15

Hon. E. T. VaughaN, Circuit Judge. 1. Before the adoption of the Code affidavits could be made before clerks. Although section 2539 Gantt’s Digest omits clerk, there are no words of exclusion or prohibition in it, nor does i.t repeal any former law. It only intended to make the certificates of the officers named proof as stated. If any other officer should take it, proof of his authority •might be produced aliunde, which is waved in this case.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 1909

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1883-11-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

ENGLISH, C. J.

¶1Jefferson McAllister sued P. C. Love before a justice of the peace of Pulaski County, on an open account for money,had and received, and on a trial recovered judgment for §73.60.

¶2Love prayed an appeal to the Circuit Court, which was granted upon the filing of an appeal affidavit made by him before W. A. Turner, county clerk of Webster County, in the State of Missouri, authenticated by his seal of office.

¶3In the Circuit Court the plaintiff moved to dismiss the appeal because no such affidavit for appeal as required by law had been filed before the justice.

¶4On the hearing of the motion it was admitted that W. A. Turner, before whom the appeal affidavit was made, was at the time clerk of Webster'County, Missouri; that the proper seal of his office was attached, and that he as such clerk was authorized by the laws of Missouri to administer oaths and take affidavits.

1. Affidavit taken by clerk of another State.

¶5The court sustained the motion to dismiss the appeal, and defendant, Love, took a bill of exceptions and appealed to this court.

¶6I. An affidavit for an appeal from a judgment of a justice of the peace to the Circuit Court must be made by the party appealing, or some person for him. Gantt’s Digest, see. 3821.

¶7An affidavit may be made out of this State before a commissioner appointed by the Governor of the State to take depositions, or before a judge of a court, mayor of a city, notary public or justice of the peace, whose certificate shall be proof of the time and manner of its being made. Gantt’s Digest, sec. 2539.

¶8An affidavit may be made in this State before a judge of a court, justice of the peace, notary public, an examiner or clerk of a court. Ib., 2540.

¶9So it seems, by these sections of the statute, an affidavit may be made in this State before the elerk of a court, but not out of the State.

¶10The officers before whom an affidavit may be made out of the State being mentioned in the statute, an affidavit made before an officer not named, is of no validity in this State. People v. Tioga, C. P., 7 Wend., 516; Stanton v. Ellis, 16 Barb., 319; Benedict v. Hall, 76 N. C., 113.

¶11Had. the statute provided that an affidavit might be made out of the State before any officer authorized by the laws of the State where made to admiuister oaths, the affidavit in question would be valid, but the statute does not so provide.

¶12If a statute does not name the officer before whom an affidavit may be made, it may be made before any officer authorized by law to administer oaths. This is the rule as to domestic affidavits. Dann v. Ketchum, 38 Cal., 93; Wood v. Jefferson Co. Bank, 9 Cowan, 205; Christman v. Floyd, 9 Wend., 342.

¶13II. On dismissing the appeal the court rendered the judgment against appellant for costs.

¶14It has been several times decided by this court that where a Circuit Court dismisses a case or an appeal for want of jurisdiction, it can render no judgment for costs. McKee v. Murphy, 1 Ark., 55; Neal v. Peay, 21 Ib., 93; Derton v. Boyd, 21 Ib., 265.

¶15The judgment for costs is reversed, and the judgment dismissing the appeal is affirmed.

/42/ark/183 · .json · Public domain