In Re Rice’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently August 2009
1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1322 · 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 11 U.S.C. § 1327 · 11 U.S.C. § 341 · 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 11 U.S.C. § 541 · 28 U.S.C. § 2075
Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc. · Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. Craft · In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions · Stellwagen v. Clum
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“On motion and upon such terms as are just, the court may relieve a party or his legal representative from a final judgment, order, or proceeding [if] ... (4) the judgment is void; (5) the judgment has been satisfied, released, or discharged, or a prior judgment upon which it is based has been reversed or otherwise vacated, or it is no longer equitable that the judgment should have prospective application; or (6) any other reason justifying relief from the operation of the judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.