Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 42 COLO 25 - Helm v. Brewster

Helm v. Brewster’s Empirical Analysis

1908

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
August 1999
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 3 district · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently August 1999

1 federal appellate · 3 district · 12 state decisions

501908191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Seitz v. Mitchell · Clements v. Moore · Burt v. Timmons · Crow v. Beardsley · 12 Colo. App. 220 - Dubois v. Clark

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Many decisions of courts of last resort in actions by creditors of a husband to set aside conveyances of property to his wife are reported, with the result that in this class of cases it has been firmly established that when a conveyance by an insolvent debtor to his wife is attacked by a creditor of the former at the time of such conveyance, the husband and wife are required to clearly establish that the transaction was honest, and that there was no intent to thereby hinder and defraud such creditor, (citations omitted).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Every conveyance . . . of any estate or interest in lands, . . . made with the intent to hinder, delay, or defraud creditors . . . of their lawful suits . . . as against the person so hindered, delayed, or defrauded shall be void.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.