Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 42 CONNAPP 307 - State v. Nival

State v. Nival’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
2
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently December 2018

21 state decisions

100199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Vose v. Cross · State v. Almeda · State v. Rumore · McIver v. Warden · State v. Delarosa

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A motion for judgment of acquittal must be granted if the evidence would not reasonably permit a guilty finding.... In ruling on a motion for judgment of acquittal, the trial court must determine whether a rational trier of fact could find the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “No bright line exists between physical injury and serious physical injury. . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.