State v. Teel’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently May 2017 · most notably Norse Systems, Inc. v. Tingley Systems, Inc. (1998), In re Jessica B. (1998)
30 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Golding · State v. Evans · Williams Ford, Inc. v. Hartford Courant Co. · State v. Robinson · In re Adam R.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Practice Book § 1-23 creates a mandatory procedure to be followed by any party seeking to recuse a judge ... and, if a party fails to follow such procedures, the record is deemed to be inadequate for our review because they are a condition precedent to a hearing on a judge's disqualification. ... Further, [r]epresentations made by counsel are not evidence in the record upon which we can rely in our review of the judge's conduct. ... The lack of a recusal hearing leaves the record bereft of any factual basis upon which we may base our review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“`It is axiomatic that the burden of establishing a record that a judicial impropriety has occurred which demonstrates or gives the appearance of bias or partiality so as to require recusal rests with the party who claims the occurrence of such an impropriety.' State v. Santangelo , 205 Conn. 578 , 584 , 534 A.2d 1175 (1987).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“an affidavit setting forth the facts relied upon to show the grounds for disqualification”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.