Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 42 Conn. App. 640 - State v. Patrick

42 Conn. App. 640 - State v. Patrick’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
2
states following
August 2016
most recently cited

38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently August 2016 · most notably Commonwealth v. Grant (2002), Nieves v. Commissioner of Correction (1999)

38 state decisions

210199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Blockburger v. United States · Benton v. Maryland · Brown v. Ohio · State v. Golding

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “manufacturing, distributing, selling, prescribing, dispensing, . . . offering, giving or administering to another person any controlled substance in or on, or within one thousand five hundred feet of, the real property comprising a public or private elementary or secondary school . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[o]ur Supreme Court has consistently concluded that the preferred vehicle for an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is either a petition for writ of habeas corpus or a petition for a new trial, not a direct appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The purpose of § 21a-278a (b) is present on its face and its legislative history. This statute was designed to protect children and schools from the danger that accompanies illegal drugs and their purveyors.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.