Zanoni v. Hudon’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 district · 64 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently September 2021 · most notably Blakeney v. Commissioner of Correction (1998), Ehrlich v. Town of Glastonbury (2003)
3 federal appellate · 2 district · 64 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Rosick v. Equipment Maintenance & Service, Inc. · In Re SR · Satti v. Rago · O'Connor v. Chiascione · Kleinman v. Marshall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The exclusive remedy for misjoinder of parties is by motion to strike.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“`Although we allow pro se litigants some latitude, the right of self-representation provides no attendant license not to comply with relevant rules of procedural and substantive law.' (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Lemoine v. McCann, 40 Conn. App. 460 , 465 , 673 A.2d 115 (1996).”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“Naming an improper person as a party in a legal action constitutes misjoinder.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.