Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 42 Conn. Super. Ct. 348 - Aronson v. Foohey

42 Conn. Super. Ct. 348 - Aronson v. Foohey’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
November 2007
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Rawling v. City of New Haven · R.A. Civitello Co. v. City of New Haven · Friedman v. Planning & Zoning Commission · Caron v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Commission · Ghent v. Planning Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The statute of limitations does not apply to bar a state agency from filing an action after the statutory period for bringing suit has expired.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he doctrine of laches may not be invoked against a governmental agency .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.