Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 42 F.2d 184 - Slee v. Commissioner

Slee v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

42 F.2d 184 · 1930

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
December 2000
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2000 · most notably United States v. Harriss (1954), Cammarano v. United States (1959)

20 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions

10019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Trinidad v. Sagrada Orden De Predicadores De La Provincia Del Santisimo Rosario De Filipinas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'must be conducted without public subvention; the Treasury stands aside from them.'”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““It may indeed be for the best interests of any community voluntarily to control the procreation of children, but the question before us is whether the statute covers efforts to proselytize in that or other causes. Of the purposes it defines ‘educational’ comes the closest, and when people organize to secure the more general acceptance of beliefs which they think beneficial to the community at large, it is common enough to say that the public must be ‘educated’ to their views. In a sense that is indeed true, but it would be a perversion to stretch the meaning of the statute to such cases ; they are indistinguishable from societies to promote or defeat prohibition, to adhere to the League of Nations, to increase the Navy, or any other of the many causes in which ardent persons engage.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.