United States v. St. Clair’s Empirical Analysis
42 F.2d 26 · 1930
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 1990
4 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hovey v. McDonald · McKnight v. United States · Ewing v. United States · In re Sherman · Hanes v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Supersedeas “is a suspension of the power of the court below to issue an execution on the judgment or decree appealed from; or, if a writ of execution has been issued, it is a prohibition emanating from the court of appeal against the execution of the writ.” (citations omitted.).... Bail is to procure release of a prisoner by securing his future attendance. Bail and supersedeas are different.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Jones v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.