Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 42 F.2d 699 - Whitmire v. Kroelinger

Whitmire v. Kroelinger’s Empirical Analysis

42 F.2d 699 · 1930

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 1995
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Mackall v. Mackall · Furman University v. Waller · Dubose v. Kell · Devlin v. Devlin · Pressley v. Kemp

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in the case of gifts inter vivos the doctrine of undue influence is stronger and more rigidly applied than in the case of wills.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The duty of [distinguishing] freedom of will on the one hand [from] `undue influence' on the other is extremely difficult.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.