Parmagini v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
42 F.2d 721 · 1930
Citation profile
43 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently May 2003 · most notably Cunningham v. State (1989), Brown v. United States (1955)
43 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 692
Relies on Sparf v. United States · Gavieres v. United States · Brasfield v. United States · Albrecht v. United States · Ebeling v. Morgan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“as used in section 8, permit him to base a count upon each drug found in the possession of the defendant although the drugs were all found at the same time and place. We do not think that any such significance can be given to the word”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.