Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 42 F.3d 1060 - Wilson v. Formigoni

Wilson v. Formigoni’s Empirical Analysis

42 F.3d 1060 · 1994

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
September 2014
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently September 2014 · most notably Frank M. Dimeglio v. J. Robert Haines (1995), Jenkins v. Medford (1997)

14 federal appellate · 1 district ·

320199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill · Parratt v. Taylor · Goldberg v. Kelly

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] court confronting a procedural due process claim must initially determine whether the government deprived a person of a protected life, liberty or property interest as a matter of substantive law, and, only if the answer is positive will the court reach the question of whether the deprivation took place without the process that was due.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “conduct [did] not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Id. See Smith v. Shettle, 946 F.2d 1250 , 1252 (7th Cir.1991) (”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.