No. 94-35527.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 14, 1994.*
Decided Nov. 25, 1994.
Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, GOODWIN and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.
¶2
Bobby and Linda Stroup appeal pro se the magistrate judge's order denying their motion for return of seized property. We lack jurisdiction to review the magistrate judge's order. See Serine v. Peterson, 989 F.2d 371, 372-73 (9th Cir.1993). Accordingly, this appeal is
¶3
DISMISSED.
*
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4
…
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3