Bradley v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
42 F.3d 434 · 1994
Citation profile
31 federal appellate · 3 district · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 78 later decisions — most recently February 2020 · most notably United States v. Hall (1999), Gonzales v. National Board of Medical Examiners (2000)
31 federal appellate · 3 district · 12 state decisions — followed in 10 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Frye v. United States · Nebraska v. Wyoming · Thompson v. Virginia · O'Conner v. Commonwealth Edison Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“(1) whether [the expert's theory] can be and has been tested; (2) whether [his theory] has been subjected to peer review and publication; (3) the known or potential rate of error; and (4) the general acceptance of the theory.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Provided the district court adhered to Daubert's parameters, we will not disturb the district court's findings unless they are manifestly erroneous.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.