Janicki Logging Co. v. Mateer’s Empirical Analysis
42 F.3d 561 · 1994
Citation profile
36 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably Kwai Fun Wong v. United States (2004), Romano v. Bible (1999)
36 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1491 · 28 U.S.C. § 1631 · 41 U.S.C. § 602 · 41 U.S.C. § 605 · 41 U.S.C. § 606 · 41 U.S.C. § 607 · 41 U.S.C. § 609
Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Bell v. Hood · Bush v. Lucas · Schweiker v. Chilicky · Town of Mashpee v. Mashpee Tribe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the procurement of construction, alteration, repair, or maintenance of real property.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[W]e review decisions involving pretrial scheduling orders issued pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 for an abuse of discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Christopher v. Gomez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.