Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 42 F.3d 769 - United States v. Enriquez

United States v. Enriquez’s Empirical Analysis

42 F.3d 769 · 1994

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently April 2019

11 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

80199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 26 U.S.C. § 6050I

Relies on United States v. Irabor · United States v. Carbone · United States v. Bonds · United States v. Restrepo · United States v. Miller

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it is likely that the same judge would reach the same result as he reached before.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “There is unquestionably a strong relationship between the two issues, but in certain cases they may be subject to different considerations, making it appropriate for the court to assess both the enhancement and the reduction. As the most obvious example, a defendant may have engaged in conduct constituting an obstruction for which a penalty enhancement is appropriate, but subsequently come to accept responsibility fully — for the obstruction as well as the crime of conviction. Although in certain cases, a government concession on the one issue may be incompatible with an application for an enhancement on the other, we see no reason why this should be a general rule.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “disqualification result[ed] not from any inappropriate action on his part, but by reason of the government's failure to adhere to its contractual obligation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.