Torre v. Casio, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
42 F.3d 825 · 1994
Citation profile
39 federal appellate · 21 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 142 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably Charles Jones v. School District of Philadelphia United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (1999), Anti-Monopoly, Inc. v. Hasbro, Inc. (1997)
39 federal appellate · 21 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 29 U.S.C. § 621 (§ 2 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 29 U.S.C. § 623 (§ 4 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · St. Mary's Honor Center v. Hicks · International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United States · Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Thurston · Fuentes v. Perskie
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 142 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a plaintiff may demonstrate age discrimination under this portion of the ADEA by either direct or indirect evidence.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a plaintiff must establish (1) that she was a member of the class protected by the ADEA, (2) that she was qualified for the position from which she was discharged, (3) that she was discharged despite those qualifications, and (4) that the position was then filled by a person sufficiently younger to permit an inference of age discrimination.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the nature of the required showing to establish a prima facie case of disparate treatment by indirect evidence depends on the circumstances of the case”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.