Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 42 F.3d 955 - Creel v. Kyle

Creel v. Kyle’s Empirical Analysis

42 F.3d 955 · 1995

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
April 2009
most recently cited

7 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Collins v. Youngblood · Beazell v. State of Ohio Chatfield

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “procedural changes, even if they work to the disadvantage of a criminal defendant, do not violate the Ex Post Facto Clause.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.