Carey v. Terhune’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Williams v. Taylor · Estelle v. McGuire · Grupo Mexicano Desarrollos v. Alliance Bond Fund Inc · Cupp v. Naughten
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We must defer to state court interpretations of state law unless the interpretation violates due process ....”) (citing Estelle v. McGuire, 502 U.S. 62, 71-72 , 112 S.Ct 475 , 116 L.Ed.2d 385 (1991)); see also generally Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98 , 121 S.Ct. 525 , 148 L.Ed.2d 388 (2000) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.