Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

42 F. App'x 660

Baker v. Cepak

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided August 20, 2002

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2002-08-20

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2003

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-08-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Paul D. Baker seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Baker v. Cepak, No. CA-01-465 (W.D.Va. Apr. 22, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 DISMISSED.

/42/fappx/660 · .json · Public domain