Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 42 FLASUPP2D 162 - Robbins v. Capo

Robbins v. Capo’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 1991
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 354 So. 2d 368 - Straughn v. Tuck · 488 So. 2d 520 - Bystrom v. Whitman · 336 So. 2d 473 - REFLEX, NV v. Umet Trust · 458 So. 2d 1122 - Markham v. Fogg · 559 So. 2d 1185 - Robbins v. Yusem

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(c) Sale of land for a purchase price which is 3 or more times the agricultural assessment placed on the land shall create a presumption that such land is not used primarily for bona fide agricultural purposes. Upon a showing of special circumstances by the landowner demonstrating that the land is to be continued in bona fide agricultural, this presumption may be rebutted.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a. The subject parcel consists of five (5) acres situated within the City of Hialeah, Florida. b. The subject property was rezoned from G-U (general use, or Interim District) to M-l (Industrial District) at the request of the owner in 1981. At the time of the rezoning request, the subject property was vacant. c. The property was purchased by Manuel and Aida Capo in April 1985 for $333,000, 74 times its agricultural assessment of $4,500.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.