Bee Machine Co. v. Freeman’s Empirical Analysis
1942
Citation profile
2 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 15 (§ 4 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914)
Relies on Lambert Run Coal Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad · General Inv Co v. Lake Shore & M S Ry Co · United States v. Cooper Corp. · Geddes v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co. · 20 F. Supp. 405 - Carroll v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““This court has jurisdiction under the anti-trust laws over a nonresident only if he is found in the district or has an agent therein. 15 U. S. C. § 15 . The defendant while in the Commonwealth was served with process in a common law action of contract. The plaintiff [respondent] obviously seeks to take advantage of this fact in order to obtain jurisdiction over the person in a suit involving”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“question presented is whether this amendment should be allowed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“have now been heard upon this [respondent’s] motion”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.