42 F. Supp. 3d 735 - In re Niaspan Antitrust Litigation’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 12 district ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 2 (§ 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 355 (§ 505 of the All Kids Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1407
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Lewis Director Arizona Department of Corrections v. Casey · O'Shea v. Littleton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] person who is a citizen of this state or a resident of this state”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“Under the continuing-violation doctrine, 'when a defendant's conduct is part of a continuing practice, an action is timely so long as the last act evidencing the continuing practice falls within the limitations period.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.