Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 42 HAW 478 - Lima v. Tomasa

Lima v. Tomasa’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
December 2021
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently December 2021

1 federal appellate · 22 state decisions

11019581960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ginoza Ex Rel. Ginoza v. Takai · Tugaeff ex rel. Tugaeff v. Tugaeff · Hawaii Builders Supply Co. v. Kaneta · Vasconcellos v. Juarez · Lum v. Stevens

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This court may vacate a judgment and remand the case for further findings if the findings are not sufficiently definite for a clear understanding of the basis of the decision. But reversal and remand are unnecessary if the decision contains an adequate discussion of the major factual issues, which leaves no doubt as to the facts upon which the trial court based its decision.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “"Where there is an assertion that the damages awarded are excessive, this court will confine its inquiry to whether, upon the evidence adduced, reasonable men could have come to the same conclusion as the jury, or the trial court in a jury-waived case. * * *"”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““Under the rule, the trial court’s findings of fact may not be set aside unless clearly erroneous. The rule also enjoins this court to give due regard to the opportunity of the trial court to judge of the credibility of the witnesses.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.