Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 42 HAW 581 - Benezet v. Nowell

Benezet v. Nowell’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 2021
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 2021

4 state decisions

2019581960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Holman v. Updike

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The purpose of a motion in writing is to give notice to the opposite party and state the grounds of the motion. There is nothing sacrosanct about the writing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.