Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 42 KAN 664 - Plant v. Thompson

Plant v. Thompson’s Empirical Analysis

1889

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
11
states following
December 1980
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently December 1980

22 state decisions — followed in 11 states

8018891890190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sussdorff v. . Schmidt · Lloyd v. . Matthews · Tyler v. Parr · Charles Kock v. Louis Emmerling · Stewart v. Mather

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The defendants will not be allowed to take advantage of their introduction to the purchaser by plaintiffs, and reap the benefits of the sale made to him in consequence, and then escape all liability of paying them their commission because they sold the land for a sum less than the price given their agents, where the reduction was made of their own accord.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.