Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 42 Kan. App. 2d 356 - State v. Johnson

42 Kan. App. 2d 356 - State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2011
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Amoco Production Co. v. Charles B. Wilson, Jr., Inc. · Abasolo v. State · State v. Wiegand · 25 Kan. App. 2d 702 - State v. Schick

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Pursuant to this paragraph the defendant shall not be sentenced to imprisonment if space is available in a conservation camp or a community intermediate sanction center and the defendant meets all of the conservation camp’s or a community intermediate sanction center’s placement criteria unless the court states on the record the reasons for not placing the defendant in a conservation camp or a community intermediate sanction center.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.