42 Kan. App. 2d 522 - LaPOINTE v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3600 (Innocence Protection Act of 2004) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Herrera v. Collins · Bracy v. Gramley · District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial District v. Osborne · United States v. Galloway
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“any determination that defense counsel's actions were a part of his trial strategy would be pure speculation without defense counsel's testimony”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Breitenbach
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.