42 Md. App. 209 - Jones v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 1994
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Rakas v. Illinois · Brookhart v. Janis · County of San Diego v. Rincon Band of Mission Indians · State v. Frye
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The facts of the present case are almost indistinguishable from those of Fairbanks . There, Fairbanks’ attorney merely asserted that his client understood what a jury trial was, that he had an absolute right to have a jury trial, and that he wished to waive that right and be tried by the court. When asked whether that recital was correct, Fairbanks replied in the affirmative. On those facts we held that there had been compliance with Rule 735. Consistency with our decision in Fairbanks, supra, dictates that we reject appellant’s argument on this issue.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Datcher v. State““Mr. Levin: Your Honor, we would waive the reading of the criminal information in case number 4620. Mr. Jones, I’ve advised you, sir, that these are serious charges and you do have the right to a jury trial in this matter. Do you understand that? The Defendant: I understand. Mr. Levin: You have to speak up so — The Defendant: I understand. Mr. Levin: Do you understand what the jury trial is? The Defendant: I understand.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Datcher v. State““A defendant reading that form would be apprised of his right to a jury trial, that a jury consists of twelve persons, and that in order to be convicted in a jury trial all twelve jurors must find a defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Datcher v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.