Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 42 Md. App. 617 - Robinson v. State

42 Md. App. 617 - Robinson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
May 2011
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently May 2011

14 state decisions

8019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 43 Cal. App. 3d 823 - People v. Lovercamp · 8 Md. App. 439 - Frasher v. State · 16 Ill. App. 3d 846 - People v. Davis · 64 Mich. App. 331 - People v. Hocquard · Stewart v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'(1) The prisoner is faced with a specific threat of death, forcible sexual attack or substantial bodily injury in the immediate future; (2) There is no time for a complaint to the authorities or there exists a history of futile complaints which makes any result from such complaints illusory; (3) There is no time or opportunity to resort to the courts; (4) There is no evidence of force or violence used towards prison personnel or other”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““[RJather early in the legal history of the offense of escape, it became clear that all departures from lawful custody were not necessarily escapes or, to put it more accurately, there was a possible defense to an escape charge, to wit, necessity. In 1 Hale P.C. 611 (1736), it was written that if a prison caught fire and a prisoner departed to save his life, the necessity to save his life ‘excuseth the felony. ’ So, too, we may assume that a prisoner with his back to the wall, facing a gang of fellow inmates approaching him with drawn knives, who are making it very clear that they intend to kill him, might be expected to go over the wall rather than remain and be a martyr to the principle of prison discipline.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “it is a defense as to all crimes except taking the life of an innocent person that the defendant acted under a compelling force of coercion or duress,” the court went on to point out that the two types of compulsion that exist are”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.