Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

42 Minn. 448

Pratt v. Sparkman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 4, 1890

Supreme Court of Minnesota · decided 1890-02-04

Action upon a promissory note, for $2,000, brought m the district court for Hennepin county against W. B. Sparkman, impleaded with the Derwood Consolidated Mining & Milling Company and others, defendants.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1946

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1890-02-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Gileillan, C. J.

¶1It is evident that the part of the answer demurred to was not stated as in and of itself a defence, but that it was alleged as a part of the transaction set forth just preceding it, and not demurred.to. The fact that what precedes it is in one paragraph, and this matter in another, does not make it appear to have been set forth as an independent defence. • '

¶2Order affirmed.

/42/minn/448 · .json · Public domain