Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 42 MO 162 - Abbott v. Lindenbower

Abbott v. Lindenbower’s Empirical Analysis

1868

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
11
states following
June 1944
most recently cited

48 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently June 1944 · most notably Schlesinger v. State of Wisconsin (1926), O'Donnell v. Wells (1929)

48 state decisions — followed in 11 states

130186818701880189019001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Whitney v. . Thomas · Curry v. Hinman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “With regard to the other matters of evidence above enumerated [except those two] we are inclined to think they were not essential pre-requisites to the lawful taxing power in the state, and that the act cannot be declared unconstitutional for the reason that it makes the deed conclusive evidence that all those things had been rightly done. They were matters of form which might be taken against him by default.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.