Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

42 Mo. 238

State v. Hunter

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 15, 1868

Supreme Court of Missouri · decided 1868-03-15

<p>1. Practice, Criminal—Appeals—Neglect to file statements, etc., how treated.— In appeals from the Criminal Court, where no statement or hriefs are filed, the case will he dismissed. In these cases the Supreme Court is governed by the practice in civil cases, and not by the act concerning criminal practice.</p>

Relies on State v. Buhs · Shaw v. Potter · Patterson v. Butler

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1868-03-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently December 1926

7 state decisions

201868187018801890190019101920decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Holmes, Judge,

¶1delivered the opinion of the court.

¶2This is an appeal from the St. Louis Criminal Court, in a suit commenced before a justice of the peace for an assault and battery. There are no statements or briefs, as required by statute. In these cases we are governed here by the practice in civil cases, and not by the act concerning criminal practice. (State v. Warne, 27 Mo. 418; 18 Mo. 318; 38 Mo. 295; 39 Mo. 419; 40 Mo. 603.)

¶3The appeal will therefore be dismissed.

The other judges concur.
/42/mo/238 · .json · Public domain