Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 42 N.C. App. 210 - State v. King

42 N.C. App. 210 - State v. King’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. McKinney · State v. Baxter · State v. Everette · 33 N.C. App. 291 - State v. Wiggins · 22 N.C. App. 663 - State v. Mitchell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[n]o itemsusually associated with drug trafficking were found which would supply an inference of an intent to sell.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “defendant's possession of seventy tablets of [a controlled substance], absent other factors supplying an intent to sell, is insufficient to withstand a motion for nonsuit on the charge of possession with intent to sell.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the requisite intent can be at least partially inferred from the quantity of controlled substance found in defendant's possession.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.