State v. Doyle’s Empirical Analysis
1964
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 6 district · 116 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 136 later decisions — most recently January 2020 · most notably State v. Novembrino (1987), State v. Bruzzese (1983)
9 federal appellate · 6 district · 116 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1
Relies on Carroll v. United States · Mapp v. Ohio · Draper v. United States · Weeks v. United States · Ker v. State of California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 136 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is sufficient if the valid arrest and search are reasonably contemporaneous, that is, they occur as parts of a single transaction, as connected units of an integrated incident.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Gaston v. State · State v. O'NEAL“Misdemeanors under the crimes act which are punishable by imprisonment for more than a year in state prison, in our judgment, and we so hold, are sufficiently equatable with common law felony to justify arrest by a peace officer without a warrant when he has reasonable ground to believe that an offense of that grade is being or has been committed by the person to be apprehended. See State v. Smith, supra (37 N.J., at p. 494). * * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“when a person is arrested lawfully, with or without a warrant, a search of his person or of the things within his immediate possession or control, or of the place of arrest to the extent that it is within his immediate possession or control, is considered incidental to the arrest, [ 42 N.J. at 344 , 200 A2d 606 .]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Henry
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.