Bron v. Weintraub’s Empirical Analysis
1964
Citation profile
67 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 71 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably Township of Montville v. Block 69, Lot 10 (1977), 355 N.J. Super. 429 - Savage v. Weissman (2002)
67 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc. · Latham v. Father Divine · Brooks v. Cooper · 129 N.J. Eq. 444 - Girard Trust Co. v. Schmitz · Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. Reeves
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he provisions of this article shall be liberally construed as remedial legislation to encourage the barring of the right of redemption by actions in the superior court to the end that marketable titles may thereby be secured.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[n]o one disputes the right of holders of interests in property to convey them to third persons if they wish”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“*• * «i We have no doubt the common conscience condemns the conduct of Hudson and Alternare as an undue interference with the rights of the householders. Hudson and Alternare having acquired the outstanding title under “circumstances which render it unconscientious for the holder of the legal title to retain and enjoy the beneficial interest, equity impresses a constructive trust on the property thus acquired in favor of the one who is truly and equitably entitled to the same.” 4 Pomeroy, Equity Jurisprudence (5th ed. 1941) § 1053, p. 119. The householders are equitably entitled to the property upon the payment of the sum of $400 plus simple interest from the date of the payment to the Weintraub heirs, [at 96]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.