State Ex Rel. Stanley v. Lujan’s Empirical Analysis
1938
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently October 1962
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Havemeyer v. Superior Court · Hammond v. 8th Jud. Dist. Ct., N.M. · Vukovich v. St. Louis, Rocky Mountain Pacific Co. · State ex rel. Parsons Mining Co. v. McClure · Board of Com'rs v. District Court of Fourth Judicial Dist.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘Having determined that the summons was defective [in that it gave the party less time than that prescribed by' statute] in the manner hereinbefore pointed out, it becomes necessary to decide what results therefrom ® * *. The authorities upon this question are not harmonious. In fact, they are in hopeless conflict ; but we think the better reasoned cases support the view that such process is void and confers no jurisdiction whatever over the person of the defendants. For the various cases discussing the subject and arriving at their divergent views see the notes appended to Lockway v. Modern Woodmen of America, Ann. Cas. 1913A 555, and Flanery v. Kusha, 6 A. L. R. 838.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Krueger v. Lynch
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.