Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 42 N.M. 450 - Van Sickle v. Keck

Van Sickle v. Keck’s Empirical Analysis

1938

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently October 2018

14 state decisions

80193819401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chesapeake Ohio Railway Company v. Addie Kelly · Roehm v. Horst · Vicksburg v. Putnam · Quinn v. Phipps · Callanan v. . K., A.C. L.C.R.R. Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A court of equity will not relieve an individual from the operation of the statute of frauds, which requires that interest in lands be created by an instrument of writing, and impose an equitable lien upon the land in favor of one who makes improvements thereon knowing that the title is in another.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.