Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 42 Ohio App. 3d 114 - Frazier v. Stickrath

42 Ohio App. 3d 114 - Frazier v. Stickrath’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
April 2023
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently April 2023

20 state decisions

8019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 10 Ohio App. 3d 217 - City of Hamilton v. Adkins · Burch v. Perini

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]hoever is unlawfully restrained of his liberty, or entitled to the custody of another, of which custody such person is unlawfully deprived, may prosecute a writ of habeas corpus, to inquire into the cause of such imprisonment, restraint, or deprivation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.