42 Ohio App. 3d 38 - State v. Stout’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently October 2025
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Berkemer v. McCarty · Minnesota v. Murphy · State v. Sage · State v. Maurer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]ppellant was under no compulsion to speak to Ritter and could have terminated the conversation at any time by simply hanging up the phone”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re D.B.“[a]ppellant was not under arrest or otherwise deprived of her freedom at the time of the conversation”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re D.B.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.