Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 42 OHIOST2D 356 - Swanton v. Stringer

Swanton v. Stringer’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
1
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 44 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently September 2017 · most notably Oswald v. Connor (1985), Schell v. Globe Trucking, Inc. (1990)

2 federal appellate · 44 state decisions

15019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 143 Ohio St. 113 - Aiken v. Industrial Commission · 140 Ohio St. 292 - Malone v. Industrial Commission · 125 Ohio St. 465 - Weaver v. Industrial Commission · 6 Ohio St. 2d 221 - Dillow v. Young · 137 Ohio St. 354 - Gwaltney v. General Motors Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘In my opinion this man had, according to the previous examination, severe and far advanced obstructive lung disease * * * any acute exposure to a significant amount of dust or irritating odors would substantially aggravate this pre-existing condition, therefore, I feel that this might be, figuratively speaking, the straw that broke the camel’s back by aggravation of the pre-existing condition. * * *’ “That testimony, although not couched in legally precise language, does support a finding by the trial court that the incident complained of proximately caused the aggravation of the preexisting disease which resulted in disability to the appellee.” (Emphasis added.)”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`[i]f the evidence before that [trial] court is sufficient to support the result reached, [the reviewing] court will not substitute its judgment.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.