Edwards v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
1914
Citation profile
48 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently February 2013 · most notably Pettis v. Johnston (1920), Harjo v. Johnston (1940)
48 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Maysville & B. S. R. R. Co. v. Ball · Meisenheimer v. Meisenheimer · Edwards v. Brusha · 22 Tex. Civ. App. 413 - Iiams v. Root · Cochrane v. Parker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A judgment is not void unless its invalidity appears on the record, and an erroneous determination of a fact properly submitted does not render it void.” ■”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.