Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 42 Or. App. 29 - State v. Anderson

42 Or. App. 29 - State v. Anderson’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
11
states following
January 2016
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently January 2016 · most notably State v. Magnano (1987), State v. Mincey (1981)

27 state decisions — followed in 11 states

16019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"In the case here under review Detectives Lasater and Dickson arrived as part of the law enforcement agency's response to the shooting report [approximately three hours after the premises had been secured]. They, as the investigators in Michigan v. Tyler , [ 436 U.S. 499 , 98 S.Ct. 1942 , 56 L.Ed.2d 486 (1978)], were not involved in the immediate emergency situation. Their purpose was to pictorially preserve the crime scene prior to the removal of the victim and to prevent accidental or intentional destruction of evidence. They needed no warrant to remain for these purposes. See State v. Eacret , 40 Or. App. 341 , 595 P.2d 490 (1979). The officers photographed only what was in plain view. They conducted no search beyond looking at what was visible to their eyes. Because they were lawfully on the premises they could constitutionally seize items of evidence in plain view."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.