Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 42 ORAPP 515 - In re Wilson

In re Wilson’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 2008
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 2008

3 state decisions

201979198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"(1) * * * Before entering upon the discharge of his official duties, each such [official] reporter shall take and subscribe an oath faithfully to perform the duties of his office. "(2) Reporters shall be officers of the court in which they serve and of any court to which an appeal is made whenever the reporter has recorded the proceedings which are the subject of the appeal."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “"(1) The following acts or omissions, in respect to a court of justice, or proceedings therein, are contempts of the authority of the court: "* * *. "(c) Misbehavior in office, or other wilful neglect or violation of duty, by an attorney, clerk, sheriff or other person appointed or selected to perform a judicial or ministerial service. "* * *."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “should not be adjudged guilty of contempt of the Court of Appeals * * * for neglecting to file transcripts in [the five cases] and why [she] should not be punished therefor in accordance with law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.